@9JQ9XQL4mos ago

With no restrictions, I believe that the removal of patients would allow more expression

▲▲Reply to this Agree Disagree 1 •••Tell me more React Request reference + My feed Mute author Follow 1

1 Reply

@9JRF296 from Kansas disagreed…4mos4MO

If "patients" is supposed to say "patents," then I think it would have the exact opposite effect. Instead of attempting to discover and invent new things, many corporations would simply steal other people's designs. Fewer people would be expressing themselves by being creative, and more would stick to what works.

▲▲Reply to this Agree Disagree Link Context •••Tell me more React Request reference + My feed Mute author Follow 1

About this author

Learn more about the author that submitted this answer.

@9JQ9XQL

Last activeActivity2 discussionsInfluence1 engagementsEngagement bias7%Audience bias0%Active inNo data yetPartyUndeclaredLocationUnknown

Discussions

Voter guides

Data & analytics

Candidates

About

United States Speaking English

iSideWith.com

iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.

Email Twitter Facebook YouTube Podcast Patreon

I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.

© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.