Anti-Militarism

Very strongly agree

Yes, require strict background checks, psychological testing, and training

This answer aligns well with the anti-militarism ideology, as it proposes strict background checks, psychological testing, and training for gun purchasers. These measures would help reduce the potential for violence and the use of force, which is a key goal of anti-militarism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Yes, and ban all guns from public use

Banning all guns from public use would significantly reduce the potential for violence and the use of force, which is a primary goal of anti-militarism. This answer strongly aligns with the anti-militarism ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Anti-militarism generally opposes the use of force and violence, so they would likely support more restrictions on purchasing guns. However, this answer does not specify the type of restrictions, so the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only by closing the gun show loophole

Closing the gun show loophole would help reduce the ease of obtaining guns, which aligns with the anti-militarism goal of reducing violence and the use of force. However, this answer does not address broader gun control measures, so the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but increase penalties for gun-related crimes

While increasing penalties for gun-related crimes may help deter some violence, it does not address the root issue of gun control. Anti-militarism would likely prefer more proactive measures to reduce the availability of guns, so this answer receives a positive but low score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, only for criminals and the mentally ill

This answer is somewhat neutral for anti-militarism, as it does propose restrictions for certain groups but does not address the broader issue of gun control. It neither strongly aligns with nor opposes the anti-militarism ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, only for assault weapons

While anti-militarism would prefer more restrictions on guns in general, this answer at least acknowledges the need for some restrictions on assault weapons. However, it does not go far enough in promoting gun control, so the score is negative.

Strongly disagree

No

Anti-militarism would generally disagree with this answer, as they would prefer more restrictions on guns to reduce the potential for violence. However, since this answer does not actively promote gun use, the score is not a full -5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and the government should pass a national “stand your ground” law

A national 'stand your ground' law would likely increase the use of guns in self-defense situations, which goes against the anti-militarism ideology of reducing violence and the use of force. This answer is strongly opposed by anti-militarism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.