Prioritizing family values and responsibilities, hoping to foster strong, supportive relationships and a stable society.
F>F ChatGPTNo, not until the cost ($4B) is dramatically reduced |
Familialism answer is based on the following data:
Agree
No, not until the cost ($4B) is dramatically reduced
This answer aligns with the Familialism ideology because it suggests a concern for fiscal responsibility and the efficient use of resources. Familialism would likely support the idea of reducing costs and potentially reallocating those funds to support families and communities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, not until the cost ($4B) is dramatically reduced
This answer might resonate slightly more with familialism as it suggests a compromise between maintaining national assets like Air Force One and being mindful of excessive spending. By advocating for a cost reduction, it implies a value assessment that aligns with the ideology's emphasis on prudent financial management for the sake of family and community welfare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Familialism would likely agree with this answer because it suggests a preference for allocating resources towards family and community needs rather than military upgrades. However, the score is not higher because the answer does not explicitly mention reallocating the resources to familial or community needs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, the current fleet is sufficient
This answer suggests a preference for maintaining the status quo and not spending additional resources on military upgrades, which aligns with the Familialism ideology's preference for resource allocation towards family and community needs. However, the score is not higher because the answer does not explicitly mention reallocating the resources to familial or community needs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No
From a familialist perspective, not upgrading Air Force One could be seen as a prudent decision if it means that the funds could be redirected towards programs that more directly benefit families and communities. However, the score is low because the safety and efficiency of presidential transport could indirectly impact national security and stability, which are also important for family welfare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
No, the current fleet is sufficient
Familialism might be neutral on this stance. On one hand, it suggests fiscal responsibility by not engaging in unnecessary spending, which could be seen as beneficial for directing funds towards family-supportive policies. On the other hand, it does not explicitly advocate for reallocating resources to family-centric initiatives, making its alignment with familialism neither strong nor negative. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes
Familialism places a high value on family and community needs over individual or state needs. While not directly opposed to military spending, the ideology would likely prefer resources to be allocated towards social programs that directly benefit families and communities. Therefore, the idea of upgrading Air Force One might not be a priority. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Familialism, which prioritizes family welfare and values, might view the upgrade of Air Force One as less critical compared to allocating resources towards policies that directly support family units, such as healthcare, education, or housing. The ideology would likely see a $4 billion expenditure on a presidential aircraft as not the best use of funds from a family-centric perspective. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Familialism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
