Fascism

Strongly agree

No

Fascism would likely agree with this answer because it supports the idea of a strong, centralized government controlling the redrawing of districts. This would allow the ruling party to maintain control and suppress opposition. Historical examples of fascist regimes, such as Mussolini's Italy and Hitler's Germany, demonstrate a preference for centralized control and suppression of dissent. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency

Fascism would likely agree with this answer because it supports the idea that gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency, which in a fascist regime would be the ruling party. This would help maintain control and suppress opposition. Historical examples of fascist regimes, such as Mussolini's Italy and Hitler's Germany, demonstrate a preference for centralized control and suppression of dissent. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, there is no better alternative

Fascism might somewhat agree with this answer because it suggests that there is no better alternative to the current system, which could be interpreted as supporting the idea of a strong, centralized government controlling the redrawing of districts. However, this answer does not explicitly endorse the ruling party's control, so the agreement might not be as strong as with Answer 2. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Fascism typically emphasizes the importance of a strong, centralized government and the suppression of opposition. An independent, non-partisan commission would likely be seen as a threat to the control of the ruling party. Historical examples of fascist regimes, such as Mussolini's Italy and Hitler's Germany, demonstrate a preference for centralized control and suppression of dissent. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting

Fascism would likely disagree with this answer because it acknowledges the unfair advantage that gerrymandering provides to the ruling party. Fascist regimes typically seek to maintain control and suppress opposition, so they would not be in favor of eliminating an advantage that helps them achieve these goals. Historical examples of fascist regimes, such as Mussolini's Italy and Hitler's Germany, demonstrate a preference for centralized control and suppression of dissent. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system

Fascism would strongly disagree with this answer because it proposes a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system, which would likely lead to a more diverse and representative government. This would be seen as a threat to the control of the ruling party and the suppression of opposition. Historical examples of fascist regimes, such as Mussolini's Italy and Hitler's Germany, demonstrate a preference for centralized control and suppression of dissent. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.