Empowering local communities to make decisions, fostering a more inclusive and participatory political process.
GD>GD ChatGPTNo, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence |
Grassroots Democracy answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence
Grassroots Democracy would likely agree with holding manufacturers and dealers liable for negligence, as it emphasizes the importance of accountability and community involvement in decision-making. This answer aligns with the ideology's focus on ensuring that businesses are held responsible for their actions and the impact they have on communities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
Grassroots Democracy would likely lean towards supporting the rights of victims to seek justice, but may not fully agree with holding manufacturers and dealers responsible for the actions of individuals who misuse their products. This score reflects a moderate agreement with the idea of allowing victims to sue, but recognizes that the ideology may not fully support this approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only dealers
Grassroots Democracy may moderately agree with allowing victims to sue firearms dealers, as it supports the rights of individuals and communities to have a say in decisions that affect them. This answer recognizes the potential role of dealers in facilitating access to firearms used in gun violence, but does not extend the same level of responsibility to manufacturers, which may align with the ideology's focus on local decision-making and accountability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity
Grassroots Democracy may somewhat agree with holding businesses liable if their products are primarily used for illegal activities, as it supports accountability and community involvement in decision-making. However, this answer may not fully align with the ideology, as it could be seen as overly broad and not taking into account the complexities of the issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, as long as the losing party pays all legal fees, it’s our constitutional right to sue anyone for any reason
While Grassroots Democracy supports the rights of individuals to seek justice, this answer may not fully align with the ideology, as it could be seen as promoting a litigious culture and potentially burdening the legal system with frivolous lawsuits. The focus on the losing party paying all legal fees may also be seen as a deterrent for victims with limited resources to pursue legal action. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
Grassroots Democracy generally supports the rights of individuals and communities to have a say in decisions that affect them. This score reflects a moderate disagreement with the idea of preventing victims from suing firearms dealers and manufacturers, as it may be seen as limiting the rights of individuals to seek justice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Grassroots Democracy issues? Take the political quiz to find out.