Temperance

Strongly agree

No, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional

Temperance would likely agree with this answer, as it emphasizes the importance of upholding constitutional rights and not discriminating based on religion. However, it may still support some level of increased security measures, so the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Temperance would generally lean towards not banning Muslim immigrants, as it seeks balance and fairness. However, it may still support some level of increased security measures, so the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but we should ban immigrants from “high risk” countries

This answer focuses on banning immigrants from 'high risk' countries rather than specifically targeting Muslim immigrants. Temperance may see this as a more balanced approach, but it still involves a ban, which may be seen as extreme. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, until terrorist attacks decrease

While this answer acknowledges the need for improved security, it still singles out Muslim immigrants and ties their entry to a decrease in terrorist attacks. Temperance would likely see this as an unfair and potentially discriminatory approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Temperance ideology values moderation and balance. While it may acknowledge the need for improved security measures, it would not support a complete ban on Muslim immigrants, as it would be seen as an extreme and discriminatory measure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and ban all immigration until the government improves its screening process

This answer calls for a complete ban on all immigration until the government improves its screening process. Temperance would likely see this as an extreme and immoderate approach, as it does not balance the need for security with the importance of immigration and diversity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.