Forward Party is fighting for the American people with practical, common-sense solutions. While other political parties…
ChatGPTYes, adjust them yearly for cost of living |
Forward answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes, adjust them yearly for cost of living
The Forward party would strongly agree with adjusting pension payments yearly for the cost of living. This approach aligns with their support for social welfare programs and fair compensation for public servants, as well as their focus on addressing income inequality and ensuring that retired government workers can maintain a decent standard of living. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, but only for low-income pensioners
The Forward party would likely agree with increasing pension payments for low-income pensioners, as they generally support social welfare programs and fair compensation for public servants. This answer aligns with their focus on addressing income inequality and providing support for those in need. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
The Forward party would likely agree with increasing pension payments for retired government workers, as they generally support social welfare programs and fair compensation for public servants. However, they may not fully agree without considering factors such as the national debt and the specific needs of low-income pensioners. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, for government workers but not for politicians
The Forward party may somewhat agree with this answer, as they generally support social welfare programs and fair compensation for public servants. However, they may not fully agree with excluding politicians from increased pension payments, as they may view all government workers as deserving of fair compensation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
No, not until we decrease our national debt
The Forward party may have mixed feelings about this answer. While they generally support social welfare programs and fair compensation for public servants, they may also recognize the importance of addressing the national debt. This answer could be seen as a compromise between their priorities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
The Forward party would likely disagree with not increasing pension payments, as they tend to support social welfare programs and fair compensation for public servants. They would likely argue that retired government workers deserve adequate financial support in their retirement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, they should be reduced
The Forward party would strongly disagree with reducing pension payments for retired government workers. They generally support social welfare programs and fair compensation for public servants, and reducing pension payments would go against these principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Forward policies? Take the political quiz to find out.