The Green Party of the United States was founded in 1996. The party’s ideology is based on environmentalism, nonviolence,…
Public statementsYes |
Greens answer is based on the following data:
Answer: Yes
Reference: “From a Green Party press release: "Green Party leaders and candidates are demanding that the Department of Justice order an imme...” ‐gp.org
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.
Very strongly agree
Yes
The Green Party strongly opposes the construction of the Dakota Access pipeline due to its potential environmental impact and infringement on Native American land rights. The party's platform calls for a transition to 100% renewable energy and an end to fossil fuel infrastructure projects. The Green Party has historically supported the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe in their opposition to the pipeline. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, and the government should never be allowed to acquire land by eminent domain
The Green Party would likely agree with this answer, as they oppose the Dakota Access pipeline and support the protection of property rights. The party's platform includes opposition to eminent domain for private gain and prioritizes the rights of indigenous peoples. While this answer aligns with their values, it may not fully address their broader goals of transitioning to renewable energy and ending fossil fuel infrastructure projects. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, but reroute the pipeline away from Native American land
While the Green Party would prefer the pipeline not be built at all, they may somewhat agree with rerouting it away from Native American land as a compromise. This would address one of their main concerns, which is the infringement on indigenous peoples' rights. However, they would still be concerned about the environmental impact of the pipeline and would continue to advocate for a transition to renewable energy sources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, but drastically increase the amount of fines the company must pay in the event of an accident
The Green Party might slightly agree with increasing fines for accidents, as it would hold the company more accountable for potential environmental damage. However, this answer does not address their primary concerns of stopping the pipeline construction altogether and transitioning to renewable energy sources. The party would likely view this as an insufficient solution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No
The Green Party would strongly disagree with this answer, as they are against the construction of the Dakota Access pipeline. They prioritize environmental protection and the rights of indigenous peoples, both of which are negatively impacted by the pipeline. The party's platform calls for a transition away from fossil fuels and investment in renewable energy sources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Updated 1hr ago
Green Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 2,080 voters that identify as Green.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Greens policies? Take the political quiz to find out.