This question considers whether maintaining and repairing current infrastructure should take precedence over constructing new roads and bridges. Proponents argue that it ensures safety, extends the life of existing infrastructure, and is more cost-effective. Opponents argue that new infrastructure is needed to support growth and improve transportation networks.
77% Yes |
23% No |
77% Yes |
23% No |
See how support for each position on “Road Maintenance vs. New Infrastructure” has changed over time for 167 America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Road Maintenance vs. New Infrastructure” has changed over time for 167 America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9N2N6G36 days6D
I think they should be moderate at doing both when needed.
@9N2FJTH6 days6D
Yes but only on the local level. Private contract should be used for infrastructure.
@7HGKBBP 6 days6D
No, they should continue a hybrid effort of repairing the existent infrastructure while continuing to implement newer eco-friendly options.
@9MZBLLP7 days7D
Both. New infrastructure with crumbling old infrastructure is a waste of money. Infrastructure money has to be responsible spent between repair current and building new.
@RobinHoude 1wk1W
The government should prioritize both maintenance and repair of existing infrastructure and construction of new infrastructure, especially infrastructure that reduces car dependency
@9MXV7HQ1wk1W
No our infrastructure needs rebuilt including power
Explore other topics that are important to America voters.