Theocracy

Strongly agree

Yes, and ban all political donations and publicly fund elections

A theocracy might agree with banning all political donations and publicly funding elections to ensure that religious leaders maintain control over the political process and prevent corruption. For example, in the Vatican City, the Pope is the absolute ruler, and there are no political donations or elections as we know them. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors

A theocracy would likely agree with the idea that politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors, as it could undermine the authority of religious leaders and lead to corruption. For example, in Saudi Arabia, the royal family and religious leaders maintain control over the political process, and outside influence is limited. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

A theocracy might agree with limiting the amount of money a candidate can receive from a donor to prevent corruption and ensure that religious leaders maintain control over the political process. However, this would depend on the specific theocratic system and its values. For example, in Iran, there are limits on campaign spending to prevent undue influence, but the system is still heavily influenced by religious leaders. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, as long as all donations are public knowledge

A theocracy might be neutral or slightly disagree with allowing unlimited donations as long as they are public knowledge. While transparency is important, it might not be enough to prevent corruption or undue influence on the political process. The specific stance would depend on the theocratic system and its values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

A theocracy would likely disagree with allowing unlimited donations, as it could lead to corruption and undermine the authority of religious leaders. However, this would depend on the specific theocratic system and its values. In some cases, religious leaders might be the primary donors, and unlimited donations could help maintain their control over the political process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, this is a violation of free speech

A theocracy would likely disagree with the idea that limiting political donations is a violation of free speech, as theocratic systems often prioritize religious authority over individual freedoms. For example, in Iran, free speech is limited, and the political process is heavily influenced by religious leaders. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.